1. image: Download

    Death of Gun Control Update: Defense Distributed’s 3D Printable WikiWeapon Coming in Mid-May

The Wiki Weapon will be made of 12 parts, printed out of ABS — conventional, fairly sturdy 3D-printed thermoplastic. According to Wilson, there will probably be just one metal part, the firing pin, while the rest — including the barrel — will be made out of plastic. As for whether it’ll actually work, Wilson and co won’t know until they actually build it, which will hopefully be in a couple of weeks. If all goes to plan, Wilson says the 3D-printed gun — which will be a custom design, rather than a reproduction of an existing pistol — will be able to fire a “few shots” before melting or breaking. After testing, the design will be uploaded to the web, so that anyone with a 3D printer can print out the handgun. You’ll still need to source your own ammunition and firing pin, though.
As you can imagine, a gun made entirely out of plastic, except for the very tip of the firing pin, would be almost undetectable by security scanners — which is a problem, because there’s the  Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988. The Act prevents DefDist from making or selling undetectable guns. ”We’re gonna be flirting with the edge of detectability,” Wilson says. ”It’s possible that there is no good way for us to comply [with the Act] and that would open up a line of prosecution.” While it seems almost certain that Wilson himself will break the law by making a 3D-printed weapon, it’ll be interesting to see if the law also prevents him from uploading the design to the internet.

(via The first all-plastic 3D-printed gun will be available to download in ‘two weeks’ | ExtremeTech)

    Death of Gun Control Update: Defense Distributed’s 3D Printable WikiWeapon Coming in Mid-May

    The Wiki Weapon will be made of 12 parts, printed out of ABS — conventional, fairly sturdy 3D-printed thermoplastic. According to Wilson, there will probably be just one metal part, the firing pin, while the rest — including the barrel — will be made out of plastic. As for whether it’ll actually work, Wilson and co won’t know until they actually build it, which will hopefully be in a couple of weeks. If all goes to plan, Wilson says the 3D-printed gun — which will be a custom design, rather than a reproduction of an existing pistol — will be able to fire a “few shots” before melting or breaking. After testing, the design will be uploaded to the web, so that anyone with a 3D printer can print out the handgun. You’ll still need to source your own ammunition and firing pin, though.

    As you can imagine, a gun made entirely out of plastic, except for the very tip of the firing pin, would be almost undetectable by security scanners — which is a problem, because there’s the  Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988. The Act prevents DefDist from making or selling undetectable guns. ”We’re gonna be flirting with the edge of detectability,” Wilson says. ”It’s possible that there is no good way for us to comply [with the Act] and that would open up a line of prosecution.” While it seems almost certain that Wilson himself will break the law by making a 3D-printed weapon, it’ll be interesting to see if the law also prevents him from uploading the design to the internet.

    (via The first all-plastic 3D-printed gun will be available to download in ‘two weeks’ | ExtremeTech)

     
  2. Genetic Copyrights: You Do Not Own Your Own Genome

On the surface, genetic copyright in just another form of the classic problem: Can we better afford to deal with the pricing that results from strong biomedical patents, or with the lack of innovations that may result from their prohibition?
This is one of the main problems facing the drug industry, which sees the vast majority of new medications developed by companies that, arguably, gouge customers in their most desperate times. We’re often presented with a dichotomy — do we want poor sick people, or dead sick people?
Yet, this study represents a growing movement within biomedical research, one aimed at changing the way we treat biological products. Traditionally, one could patent “anything under the sun that is made by man”, which would seem to exclude biological patents, but American and European patent authorities accept them by the thousands.

(via Do you own your genes, or can Big Pharma patent them? | ExtremeTech)

    Genetic Copyrights: You Do Not Own Your Own Genome

    On the surface, genetic copyright in just another form of the classic problem: Can we better afford to deal with the pricing that results from strong biomedical patents, or with the lack of innovations that may result from their prohibition?

    This is one of the main problems facing the drug industry, which sees the vast majority of new medications developed by companies that, arguably, gouge customers in their most desperate times. We’re often presented with a dichotomy — do we want poor sick people, or dead sick people?

    Yet, this study represents a growing movement within biomedical research, one aimed at changing the way we treat biological products. Traditionally, one could patent “anything under the sun that is made by man”, which would seem to exclude biological patents, but American and European patent authorities accept them by the thousands.

    (via Do you own your genes, or can Big Pharma patent them? | ExtremeTech)

     
  3. image: Download

    Feds Set to Crack Down on BitCoin Anonymity, Targeting Exchanges Under Money-Laundering Laws

The federal agency charged with enforcing the nation’s laws against money laundering has issued new guidelines suggesting that several parties in the Bitcoin economy qualify as Money Services Businesses under US law.
Money Services Businesses (MSBs) must register with the federal government, collect information about their customers, and take steps to combat money laundering by their customers.
The new guidelines do not mention Bitcoin by name, but there’s little doubt which “de-centralized virtual currency” the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) had in mind when it drafted the new guidelines.
A FinCEN spokesman told Bank Technology News last year that “we are aware of Bitcoin and other similar operations, and we are studying the mechanism behind Bitcoin.”
America’s anti-money-laundering laws require financial institutions to collect information on potentially suspicious transactions by their customers and report these to the federal government.
Among the institutions subject to these regulatory requirements are “money services businesses,” including “money transmitters.” Until now, it wasn’t clear who in the Bitcoin network qualified as a money transmitter under the law.

(via US regulator: Bitcoin exchanges must comply with money-laundering laws | Ars Technica)

    Feds Set to Crack Down on BitCoin Anonymity, Targeting Exchanges Under Money-Laundering Laws

    The federal agency charged with enforcing the nation’s laws against money laundering has issued new guidelines suggesting that several parties in the Bitcoin economy qualify as Money Services Businesses under US law.

    Money Services Businesses (MSBs) must register with the federal government, collect information about their customers, and take steps to combat money laundering by their customers.

    The new guidelines do not mention Bitcoin by name, but there’s little doubt which “de-centralized virtual currency” the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) had in mind when it drafted the new guidelines.

    A FinCEN spokesman told Bank Technology News last year that “we are aware of Bitcoin and other similar operations, and we are studying the mechanism behind Bitcoin.”

    America’s anti-money-laundering laws require financial institutions to collect information on potentially suspicious transactions by their customers and report these to the federal government.

    Among the institutions subject to these regulatory requirements are “money services businesses,” including “money transmitters.” Until now, it wasn’t clear who in the Bitcoin network qualified as a money transmitter under the law.

    (via US regulator: Bitcoin exchanges must comply with money-laundering laws | Ars Technica)

     
  4. image: Download

    DARPA’s “Augmented Cognition” Program Raises Ethical Problems for Neuroscientists

The Pentagon’s expanding work in neuroscience in recent years has focused on medical applications, like research to understand traumatic brain injury and on concepts intended to help the military fight wars more effectively, such as studying ways to keep soldiers’ brains alert even after days without sleep.
But under the rubric of “Augmented Cognition,” DARPA has also pursued a number of military technologies, like goggles that would monitor a soldier’s brain signals to pick up potential threats before the conscious mind is aware of them.
While some of the applications might be a generation away, or may never arrive, like mind-controlled drones, others, like the brain-monitoring goggles, are already in testing (though probably not ready for use in the field).
[This raises] questions from ethicists, who are pushing for the government to begin now to think about “neuro ethics.” In a 2012 article published last year in the journal Plos Biology, Jonathan Moreno, a professor of medical ethics, and Michael Tennison, a professor of neurology, argued that many neuroscientists don’t think about the contribution of their work to warfare, or consider the ethical implication of such work.
The question they raise is what choice future soldiers might have in such cognitively enhanced warfare. “If a warfighter is allowed no autonomous freedom to accept or decline an enhancement intervention, and the intervention in question is as invasive as remote brain control,” they write, “then the ethical implications are immense.”

(via Ten extraordinary Pentagon mind experiments | KurzweilAI)

    DARPA’s “Augmented Cognition” Program Raises Ethical Problems for Neuroscientists

    The Pentagon’s expanding work in neuroscience in recent years has focused on medical applications, like research to understand traumatic brain injury and on concepts intended to help the military fight wars more effectively, such as studying ways to keep soldiers’ brains alert even after days without sleep.

    But under the rubric of “Augmented Cognition,” DARPA has also pursued a number of military technologies, like goggles that would monitor a soldier’s brain signals to pick up potential threats before the conscious mind is aware of them.

    While some of the applications might be a generation away, or may never arrive, like mind-controlled drones, others, like the brain-monitoring goggles, are already in testing (though probably not ready for use in the field).

    [This raises] questions from ethicists, who are pushing for the government to begin now to think about “neuro ethics.” In a 2012 article published last year in the journal Plos Biology, Jonathan Moreno, a professor of medical ethics, and Michael Tennison, a professor of neurology, argued that many neuroscientists don’t think about the contribution of their work to warfare, or consider the ethical implication of such work.

    The question they raise is what choice future soldiers might have in such cognitively enhanced warfare. “If a warfighter is allowed no autonomous freedom to accept or decline an enhancement intervention, and the intervention in question is as invasive as remote brain control,” they write, “then the ethical implications are immense.”

    (via Ten extraordinary Pentagon mind experiments | KurzweilAI)

     
  5. Anonymous PWNS The Fed

The Federal Reserve said on Tuesday that one of its internal websites had been briefly breached by hackers, though no critical functions of the U.S. central bank were affected by the intrusion.
The admission, which raises questions about cyber security at the Fed, follows a claim that hackers linked to the activist group Anonymous had struck the Fed on Sunday, accessing personal information of more than 4,000 U.S. bank executives, which it published on the Web.
“The Federal Reserve system is aware that information was obtained by exploiting a temporary vulnerability in a website vendor product,” a Fed spokeswoman said.
“Exposure was fixed shortly after discovery and is no longer an issue. This incident did not affect critical operations of the Federal Reserve system,” the spokeswoman said, adding that all individuals effected by the breach had been contacted.

(via Fed Confirms That Hackers Breached Its Internal Site - Business Insider)

    Anonymous PWNS The Fed

    The Federal Reserve said on Tuesday that one of its internal websites had been briefly breached by hackers, though no critical functions of the U.S. central bank were affected by the intrusion.

    The admission, which raises questions about cyber security at the Fed, follows a claim that hackers linked to the activist group Anonymous had struck the Fed on Sunday, accessing personal information of more than 4,000 U.S. bank executives, which it published on the Web.

    “The Federal Reserve system is aware that information was obtained by exploiting a temporary vulnerability in a website vendor product,” a Fed spokeswoman said.

    “Exposure was fixed shortly after discovery and is no longer an issue. This incident did not affect critical operations of the Federal Reserve system,” the spokeswoman said, adding that all individuals effected by the breach had been contacted.

    (via Fed Confirms That Hackers Breached Its Internal Site - Business Insider)

     
  6. image: Download

    The End of Gun Control: Wiki Weapon Inventor Demos “Cuomo” 3D Printed High-Capacity Magazine

Defense Distributed, the Austin, Texas-based project by 24-year-old law student Cody Wilsonand several others to develop 3D printed firearms and firearm components, or “Wiki Weapons,” on Thursday posted a new video online showing a successful test firing of a new 3D printed high-capacity (30-round) automatic rifle (ArmaLite, or AR) magazine, named “Cuomo,” after New York State’s gun-control supporting governor Andrew Cuomo.
New York recently passed a law banning all magazines in excess of 7 rounds (except for law enforcement use), the nation’s toughest magazine regulation.
“He [Cuomo] wants to be associated with these magazines,” Wilson told TPM, reached by phone on Thursday. “Lets make that association permanent.”

(via Defense Distributed’s New 3D Printed High Capacity Gun Magazine ‘Cuomo’ (VIDEO) | TPM Idea Lab)

    The End of Gun Control: Wiki Weapon Inventor Demos “Cuomo” 3D Printed High-Capacity Magazine

    Defense Distributed, the Austin, Texas-based project by 24-year-old law student Cody Wilsonand several others to develop 3D printed firearms and firearm components, or “Wiki Weapons,” on Thursday posted a new video online showing a successful test firing of a new 3D printed high-capacity (30-round) automatic rifle (ArmaLite, or AR) magazine, named “Cuomo,” after New York State’s gun-control supporting governor Andrew Cuomo.

    New York recently passed a law banning all magazines in excess of 7 rounds (except for law enforcement use), the nation’s toughest magazine regulation.

    “He [Cuomo] wants to be associated with these magazines,” Wilson told TPM, reached by phone on Thursday. “Lets make that association permanent.”

    (via Defense Distributed’s New 3D Printed High Capacity Gun Magazine ‘Cuomo’ (VIDEO) | TPM Idea Lab)

     
  7. image: Download

    Creator of CV Dazzle Debuts Anti-Surveillance Clothing Line

Brooklyn-based artist Adam Harvey is scheduled to unveil a line of fashion called Stealth Wear at a London studio. Working in collaboration with fashion designer Johanna Bloomfield, Harvey used materials designed to disguise and protect the wearer from thermal imaging, X-rays, and other technologies commonly used in surveillance. The garments include “an anti-drone hoodie and matching scarf…and a pocket protector that he says blocks cell phones from sending and receiving signals.” At the exhibit, each garment will be accompanied by information about the relevant technology and counter-technology behind its creation.

(via Worried About Drones? Try Wearing This Hoodie | IdeaFeed | Big Think)

    Creator of CV Dazzle Debuts Anti-Surveillance Clothing Line

    Brooklyn-based artist Adam Harvey is scheduled to unveil a line of fashion called Stealth Wear at a London studio. Working in collaboration with fashion designer Johanna Bloomfield, Harvey used materials designed to disguise and protect the wearer from thermal imaging, X-rays, and other technologies commonly used in surveillance. The garments include “an anti-drone hoodie and matching scarf…and a pocket protector that he says blocks cell phones from sending and receiving signals.” At the exhibit, each garment will be accompanied by information about the relevant technology and counter-technology behind its creation.

    (via Worried About Drones? Try Wearing This Hoodie | IdeaFeed | Big Think)

     
  8. image: Download

    NYPD Closer to Deploying Teraherz Radiation Scanners on The Street


The device is small enough to fit inside a police car or on a street corner where gun violence is common, Rocco Parascandola of The NY Daily News reports.
It works by testing for terahertz radiation, which is the natural energy that both people and inanimate objects emit. 
“If something is obstructing the flow of that radiation, for example a weapon, the device will highlight that object,” NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly said Wednesday.
The NYPD hopes to deploy these devices soon, but Kelly said that there are still “a number of trials to run” before that actually happens. 


(via New Technology Helps Cops See Hidden Guns From Far Away)

    NYPD Closer to Deploying Teraherz Radiation Scanners on The Street

    The device is small enough to fit inside a police car or on a street corner where gun violence is common, Rocco Parascandola of The NY Daily News reports.

    It works by testing for terahertz radiation, which is the natural energy that both people and inanimate objects emit. 

    “If something is obstructing the flow of that radiation, for example a weapon, the device will highlight that object,” NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly said Wednesday.

    The NYPD hopes to deploy these devices soon, but Kelly said that there are still “a number of trials to run” before that actually happens. 

    (via New Technology Helps Cops See Hidden Guns From Far Away)

     
  9. Lehmann Aviation Debuts the $1,200 Personal Drone

    Lehmann Aviation calls the device, whose full name is the LA100, “the world’s first aircraft designed for the users with no piloting background.” How does it work? Simple. Connect the battery and launch it. Wait five minutes for the drone to come back. You’re done. Assuming you strapped a GoPro camera up there–it can be mounted in one of two positions, either atop the wing for oblique images, or below the wing for vertical ones–then you’ve also got a card full of pictures.

    The device has a 92 cm wingspan and weighs just 850 grams, made of foam and carbon fiber. The device is rugged and can handle temperatures as low as -25 degrees Celsius. Lehmann Aviation promises regular hardware and software upgrades on its site.

    (via A Drone of One’s Own | MIT Technology Review)

     
  10. image: Download

    Is the US Waging Cyberwar Against Our French Allies?

French website L’Express has a story about the sophistication of the attack. It’s clear from this description that the attack doesn’t fit China’s MO.
Instead of sheer brute force, the attack used social engineering tactics to gain access to accounts held by top French leaders. From there, computers were then infected with an advanced virus that is described as similar to the US-Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear program.
Of course, the United States is denying involvement. The Verge has received an outright denial from the US Embassy in France: “We categorically deny these allegations from unnamed sources, published in L’Express, that the United States government has participated in a cyberattack against France.”
It doesn’t make much of a difference, though. Regardless of guilt, the US would undoubtedly react the same way. It’d be quite silly for the US to cop to an attack on an ally publicly. This might even be a case of the right hand purposefully not knowing what the left is doing. Some black ops squad of hackers attacking an ally would almost certainly be well hidden from the rest of the government.

(via Tensions rise as the US is accused of cyberwarfare with France | ExtremeTech)

    Is the US Waging Cyberwar Against Our French Allies?

    French website L’Express has a story about the sophistication of the attack. It’s clear from this description that the attack doesn’t fit China’s MO.

    Instead of sheer brute force, the attack used social engineering tactics to gain access to accounts held by top French leaders. From there, computers were then infected with an advanced virus that is described as similar to the US-Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear program.

    Of course, the United States is denying involvement. The Verge has received an outright denial from the US Embassy in France: “We categorically deny these allegations from unnamed sources, published in L’Express, that the United States government has participated in a cyberattack against France.”

    It doesn’t make much of a difference, though. Regardless of guilt, the US would undoubtedly react the same way. It’d be quite silly for the US to cop to an attack on an ally publicly. This might even be a case of the right hand purposefully not knowing what the left is doing. Some black ops squad of hackers attacking an ally would almost certainly be well hidden from the rest of the government.

    (via Tensions rise as the US is accused of cyberwarfare with France | ExtremeTech)